Suunto T3c T4c and T6c - general questions

I now think that a HRM with distance/pace measurement would help and and have also been intrigued by the training effect concept. So have narrowed down my selection to the Garmin 405 and the suunto t3c/t6c.

<<<< Good choices to start with >>>>

My questions are:

1) I mainly run outside in variable terrain, also tend to be alot of trees where I run. Would the GPS of the 405 and Suunto be able to cope with this?

<<< yes, the new SIRF aerial is VERY SENSITIVE >>>>

http://www.heartratemonitor.co.uk/garmin_forerunner_405.html

Garmin forerunner aerial sensitivity tests.. for 405 read 305 … same SIRF high sensitivity aerial

2) Would the Suunto foot pod work in hilly terrain - the Suunto web-site indicates it accomodes hills but I have read conflicting information on the web about foot pods - what is your experience with this particular one?

<<< yes, from my experience it is fine on hills… as it is on SAND or soft grass versus tarmac / track etc>>>>>

3) Does the training effect concept work and is it in your view more important than perfect distance/pace measurement in improving performance?

<<< it 100% works… it very clearly indicates where there are patterns of over/under training… allowing you to make changes to training plan and achieving results more effectively and quickly. It is 100% not a gimmick and it is justification enough to buy a T3/4/6 >>>>

4) Finally - is the T6c overkill for someone like me - what would it give me in practical terms that the t3c would not?

<<<< It would give you better PC analysis and altitude data…. nice if within budget, but not the end of the world it outside budget >>>>>>

Finally which would you most recommend as an effective training tool for runners?

<<<< T3C or above with FOOT POD >>>>

http://www.heartratemonitor.co.uk/suunto_t3c_heart_monitor.html