GPS or Foot POD
We’ve been using heart rate monitors with both GPS and foot pod accelerometers for 4 years now. The Garmin Forerunner 301 was the first GPS based unit we used. The Nike CV10 was the first foot pod style heart rate monitor.
From our own tests:
http://www.heartratemonitor.co.uk/footpod_accelerometers_inertia.html this is the link
We’ve found that there isn’t much difference at all. Personally I prefer foot pod style as the batteries last that much longer, and you don’t notice the pod on your shoe. Although… GPS is convenient as it works for any outdoor sport, and it doesn’t require calibration…… that said… 90% + of our customers don’t need to calibrate the foot pods….
What do you think?
This entry was posted on 12/11/2007 at 06:04 pm and is filed under Heart Rate Monitors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
12/11/2007 at 06:07 pm
I prefer GPS… the Garmin Forerunner 305 is great. It does everything I could ever want from a running watch / heart rate monitor. A foot pod might be useful in the gym, so I have a record of running speed/distance etc… maybe I will treat myself to one.
STAN